Miami-Dade County

Payroll Variance Analysis

Executive Summary

Analysis of Miami-Dade County's payroll data for the first 13 pay periods of 2025 reveals significant variance between expected and actual compensation. The county paid $1,080,686,756 against an expected baseline of $843,158,154, resulting in a net variance of $237,528,602.

Key findings include 544 employees who have already exceeded their annual salary within the first half of the year, and approximately 86% of the workforce (21,495 employees) on pace to earn more than their stated annual compensation. If current trends continue, the projected year-end variance could reach $475,057,204.

The variance is concentrated primarily in Transportation & Public Works (21.1%), Fire Rescue (20.3%), and Corrections & Rehabilitation (15.0%), which together account for over half of the total overpayment. These findings warrant further investigation to understand the underlying drivers and ensure appropriate controls are in place.

Total Overpayment

$255,909,896

Above expected baseline

Total Underpayment

-$18,381,294

Below expected baseline

Net Variance (YTD)

$237,528,602

Total variance from baseline

Projected Year-End

$475,057,204

If current pace continues

Key Performance Indicators

Critical metrics requiring management attention

544
Employees exceeding annual salary
Total overage: $6,366,480
21,495
Employees pacing above salary
86% of total workforce
28.2%
Variance from expected payroll
$237,528,602 above baseline

Top 10 Departments by Total Pay Variance

Departments with the highest overpayment amounts requiring priority review

Top 10 Departments by Total Pay Variance (Detailed)

1TRANSPORTATION & PUBLIC WORKS$53,957,55621.1%
2FIRE RESCUE$51,991,67820.3%
3CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION$38,492,97215.0%
4WATER AND SEWER$36,383,31314.2%
5AVIATION$13,274,9875.2%
6SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT$10,096,9413.9%
7INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY$7,531,2922.9%
8PARKS, RECREATION & OPEN SPCS$7,252,8392.8%
9INTERNAL SERVICES$6,671,7822.6%
10REGULATORY & ECONOMIC RESOURCE$5,973,8482.3%

Top 10 Employees by Individual Pay Variance & EOY Projection

1FERNANDEZ, DAVID JFIRE RESCUEFIRE LIEUTENANT$143,517$435,784$292,267
2DAVIS, LENARD BTRANSPORTATION & PUBLIC WORKSDTPW FACILITIES SUPERVISOR$101,463$379,630$278,167
3HANDLEY, PATRICK HFIRE RESCUEFIRE DEPT HELICOPTER CO-PILOT$166,835$433,840$267,005
4REYES, ROMULOFIRE RESCUEFIREFIGHTER$125,623$381,946$256,323
5SUAREZ, ALEXISFIRE RESCUEFIRE LIEUTENANT$137,870$392,406$254,536
6MC ARTHUR, VINCENT RFIRE RESCUEFIRE CAPTAIN$163,863$417,564$253,701
7BOUZA, OSCARFIRE RESCUEFIRE LIEUTENANT$158,158$390,768$232,610
8JADALLAH, RAIED SFIRE RESCUEFIRE CHIEF$305,661$537,996$232,335
9INFANTOLINO, ANTHONY MFIRE RESCUEFIRE CAPTAIN$168,830$399,948$231,118
10SIMPSON, JOHN DTRANSPORTATION & PUBLIC WORKSDTPW FACILITIES SUPERVISOR$101,463$327,734$226,271

Top 10 Pacing Anomalies: Employees Paid More Than Annual Salary

1DAVIS, LENARD BTRANSPORTATION & PUBLIC WORKSDTPW FACILITIES SUPERVISOR$101,463$189,815$88,352
2MILIAN ORBIS, NATALIEBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSCOMMISSIONER MIAMI DADE CTY$6,000$92,473$86,473
3FERNANDEZ, DAVID JFIRE RESCUEFIRE LIEUTENANT$143,517$217,892$74,375
4ALLEN III, COY WTRANSPORTATION & PUBLIC WORKSMETROMOVER TECHNICIAN$78,965$150,493$71,528
5REYES, ROMULOFIRE RESCUEFIREFIGHTER$125,623$190,973$65,350
6ORDAZ, HECTORTRANSPORTATION & PUBLIC WORKSMETROMOVER TECHNICIAN$84,096$148,138$64,041
7SIMPSON, JOHN DTRANSPORTATION & PUBLIC WORKSDTPW FACILITIES SUPERVISOR$101,463$163,867$62,404
8CROOKS, MICHAEL GTRANSPORTATION & PUBLIC WORKSMETROMOVER TECHNICIAN$84,096$143,520$59,423
9SUAREZ, ALEXISFIRE RESCUEFIRE LIEUTENANT$137,870$196,203$58,333
10SMART, TRAVISTRANSPORTATION & PUBLIC WORKSMETROMOVER TECHNICIAN$76,520$134,178$57,658

Top 10 Extreme Salary Outliers & Annual Impact

1KENERSON, KATHERINE LMEDICAL EXAMINERAST MEDICAL EXAMINER$327,487$274,741$52,746
2THOMPSON, KATRINA LAVIATIONAIRPORT SR PERSONNEL SPECIALIS$112,389$82,828$29,561
3FOSTER, ERICPUBLIC HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVHCD STRUCTURAL MAINT TECH$78,104$48,591$29,513
4FERNANDEZ, JESUS CTRANSPORTATION & PUBLIC WORKSTRAFFIC ENGINEER 1$108,246$79,953$28,293
5BARNA, NICHOLAS JOSEPHMEDICAL EXAMINERAST MEDICAL EXAMINER$303,003$274,741$28,262
6NORIEGA, RICARDO AWATER AND SEWERTREATMENT PLANT OPERATOR 1 TRA$102,766$74,596$28,170
7NICKERSON, ANTONIO LPUBLIC HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVHCD STRUCTURAL MAINT TECH$76,365$48,591$27,774
8PARKER, LORAINA VPUBLIC HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVHCD STRUCTURAL MAINT TECH$76,365$48,591$27,774
9GARCIA, JOSE LTRANSPORTATION & PUBLIC WORKSDTPW ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEWER$73,960$48,168$25,792
10PACE, KEVA LSTRATEGIC PROCUREMENTCONT CERTIFICATION SPEC 2$110,659$85,264$25,395

Methodology & Interpretation Notes

Detailed methodology and interpretation guidelines for transparency

Analysis Method

This analysis calculates "Pay Variance" as the difference between an employee's actual year-to-date (YTD) pay and their expected pay. Expected pay is calculated based on 13 of 26 completed pay periods (Annual Salary × 13/26). Findings are presented as potential indicators, not conclusions, and require further documentation review.

Fiscal Year vs. Calendar Year

While Miami-Dade County's fiscal year begins October 1, this analysis uses calendar year data (starting January 1) because the source data from the county's Open Data Hub was created December 31, suggesting the "Gross YTD" column aligns with the calendar year. This was validated by spot-checking salaried employees who don't qualify for overtime, including the Mayor.

Data Limitations

The financial totals presented are estimates based on a consistent methodology. Different analytical approaches, rounding, or data filtering could produce slightly different results. The goal is to demonstrate that the general scale of variance is significant and directionally accurate, not to present exact audit figures.

Interpretation Guidelines

This analysis was conducted independently to identify potential areas for improvement and cost savings. Findings are presented as facts derived from the data, leaving assumptions and conclusions to the reader. Complexities of public finance may explain some variances, and further documentation review is recommended for all flagged cases.

Important Note

These findings represent potential indicators that warrant further investigation. They do not constitute definitive proof of waste, fraud, or abuse. Each case requires individual review and documentation to determine legitimacy and appropriate action.

Miami-Dade County Payroll Variance Analysis Dashboard

Data Period: January 1, 2025 – July 14, 2025 (13 Pay Periods)